Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become achieved, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed below have had opinions filed for them within the last 14 days. The following information is available for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
Unfortunately, that wasn't correct. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the few’s son several times.
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.
The legislation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is usually a regulation that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Will you be looking for Court Information? You should use our site to search for your case or search for the person. Information on the site is updated every 24 several hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found about the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety days with the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly established now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, get more info for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Criminal cases While in the common law tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their personal previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.